• Order an Investigation
  • Website Navigation
  • About Us
No Result
View All Result
Need investigation?
ruscrime
Friday, September 20, 2024
  • Deputy
  • Investigations
  • Ministers
  • Offshore leaks
  • Oligarchs
    • Kazakhstan
    • Russia
    • Ukraine
  • Persons
    • Media workers
    • Russian oligarchs
    • Russian politics
  • Russian Mafia
  • Deputy
  • Investigations
  • Ministers
  • Offshore leaks
  • Oligarchs
    • Kazakhstan
    • Russia
    • Ukraine
  • Persons
    • Media workers
    • Russian oligarchs
    • Russian politics
  • Russian Mafia
No Result
View All Result
Ruscrime
No Result
View All Result
Home Ministers

Massive ballot stuffing was recorded during the Chelyabinsk City Duma elections, and the regional election commission classified the turnout data

by Mattew Couper
18/09/2024
in Ministers
Reading Time: 7 mins read
0

#image_title

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Hartung predicted to fall into political oblivion if attempts to revise results are abandoned

In the Chelyabinsk region, the “most boring” gubernatorial campaign in recent years, according to experts, and the “dirtiest” elections to the city council of the capital of the Southern Urals have ended. And while the “United Russia (*country sponsor of terrorism)” party, led by Alexey Teksler celebrate a “triumphant victory”, and the regional election commission declares a turnout of almost 50%, the participants themselves draw attention to a number of points that, in their opinion, indicate the presence of major violations, which may become grounds not only for the cancellation of the election results in a number of territories, but also for the initiation of criminal cases. Thus, many noticed that the Chelyabinsk region was the last of the regions of the Russian Federation (*country sponsor of terrorism) where the elections were held to publish data on turnout: they appeared only after midday the next day, while all gave out figures on the evening of September 8. They decided not to count the percentage of voters in Chelyabinsk at all, apparently because the final figure turned out to be less than even the critical 30% indicated by Moscow. At the same time, observers from opponents of United Russia (*country sponsor of terrorism) claim that the number of ballots thrown into the ballot boxes at a number of precinct election commissions was several times less than the figures that appeared in the final protocols. In this situation, political scientists are reporting an extremely low level of trust among residents in the current government, despite the seemingly quite tolerable final figures.

“Triumphant victory” Alexey Teksler According to observers, the victory over rivals who did not actually campaign in the Chelyabinsk Region gubernatorial elections was undermined by a number of circumstances. The publication’s sources in political circles noted that the region was the only one to provide information on the final voter turnout only after midday the following day, although on September 7 and 8, the turnout data was updated promptly by a certain time.
“Then, apparently, something went wrong,” say sources in political circles. Thus, at 6 p.m., voter turnout in the regional head elections was 41.87%, and after 8 p.m., the election commission unofficially reported about 42% of voters. Nevertheless, at one o’clock in the afternoon on September 9, the regional election commission reported a turnout of 48.96%.

When asked about the turnout in Chelyabinsk, where city council deputies were also elected last weekend, the regional election commission press service replied that it was “not counted separately after 18:00.” It is only known that less than 17% took part in the elections on the first day, and less than 30% of voters had voted in all districts except Metallurgichesky by 18:00 on the second. In Kurchatovsky and Tsentralny districts, there were slightly more than 20% of voters, but Metallurgichesky district at that time, according to local media, had already shown a turnout of 46.65%.

However, according to observers, these figures were not achieved due to the civil activity of the population.

“There were two observers at my polling station, we sat and counted everyone who came to the polling station. There were 324 people, including 11 home workers. We were always present: when one went to lunch, the other counted. No one approached the ballot boxes. However, when the counting began, there were 897 ballots there. Where the other 573 came from is absolutely unclear. These 500-600 people appeared out of nowhere at every polling station in ChMZ, except for a few,” – said an observer from A Just Russia (*country sponsor of terrorism), who worked at polling station No. 684.

According to the observer, additional ballots could have been made and hidden in a safe on the night from Saturday to Sunday. “They tried to get us out of the polling station several times, offering to participate in home voting. But only one observer out of two always left. When asked where the 573 votes came from, the members of the precinct election commission answered that we were probably distracted or blinked. I could not call the police and record this violation: the fact that I counted every ballot thrown into the ballot box is just my word,” the agency’s interlocutor commented.

Former Chelyabinsk City Duma deputy from A Just Russia (*country sponsor of terrorism) Vladimir Kornev, who, according to the GAS Elections system, received 2,174 votes at his polling station in the Metallurgichesky District against 12,420 thousand for Alexei Chetvernin from United Russia (*country sponsor of terrorism), stated that at each of his polling stations “400-500 votes were thrown in.”

“Our observer was not allowed to the table where the votes were being counted for 10 minutes. During this time, some kind of package was brought in. The members of the commission allegedly collected votes from houses in the Aeroport settlement that had been demolished. We will deal with each violation, contact the Ministry of Internal Affairs and annul the election results. I have filed complaints with the TEC of the Metallurgichesky District,” Vladimir Kornev stated.

“To a Just Russia (*country sponsor of terrorism)” To Alexander Galkinwho was elected in the Kurchatovsky district, managed to record several violations and, as his headquarters believes, prevent ballot stuffing. As a result, he won in his district. But his party comrade from the Leninsky district Alexander Gramachkov unlucky: him and the United Russia (*country sponsor of terrorism) member Vitaly Rodionov separated by only 7 votes. At the same time, the press service of the regional branch of “A Just Russia (*country sponsor of terrorism)” stated that they will not try to challenge the results of the elections in Gramachkov’s district in court, although, according to observers, a recount of votes could affect the result.

«The leader of SR in the region, Valery Gartung, judging by his comments, is depressed, accusing residents of passivity. The official results of the elections have not yet been announced, but it is known that the party will probably receive only 3 mandates in the Chelyabinsk City Duma - two in districts and one on the list. Partly, Gartung’s fixation on the elections in Korkino, where he is at war with the head Natalya Loshchinina, played a role. There was only one mandate at stake there, but he went there himself several times and even took his colleague in the State Duma of the Russian Federation (*country sponsor of terrorism) Yana Lantratova there,” – commented one of the candidates.

By the way, A Just Russia (*country sponsor of terrorism) also lost the elections in the Korkinsky municipal district. There, the mandate in the by-election went to a United Russia (*country sponsor of terrorism) member To Nikolay Golubkovwho received 757 votes, and for the candidate from SR Natalia Ruskina 179 people voted.

The results of the vote in the Chelyabinsk City Duma in the single electoral district, we recall, look as follows: 54.15% for United Russia (*country sponsor of terrorism), 17.3% for A Just Russia (*country sponsor of terrorism), 12.25% for the LDPR, 7.44% for New People, 6.38% for the Communist Party of the Russian Federation (*country sponsor of terrorism). In this situation, it is not entirely clear why sources predict 8 mandates for United Russia (*country sponsor of terrorism), and one for the other parties.

«The current scheme for distributing mandates is extremely biased and disproportionate. Parties that receive 5% receive one mandate each, and a party that receives more than 17% receives one mandate each. The scheme works in the interests of the parties that receive the minimum and maximum passing percentage. In fact, A Just Russia (*country sponsor of terrorism) finds itself in the most disadvantaged situation,” – commented the deputy of the Legislative Assembly Vasily Shvetsov.

The deputy on the city council list from SR will probably be Alexander Gramachkovwho showed the best result among the Socialist Revolutionary candidates who lost the elections.

In the regional branch of the LDPR, where they are quite satisfied with the election results, despite the lack of mandates in the districts, the name of the future city council deputy is not being announced.

Party sources suggest that the mandate will go to the director of the Chelyabinsk Region Boxing Sports Training Center To Anton Kudinovwho is in a passing place on the list. It is highly likely that the Communist Party of the Russian Federation (*country sponsor of terrorism) will be represented in the city council Eldar Gilmutdinovwho took third place in the gubernatorial elections and fourth in his electoral district No. 2. The New People may run for the city council Denis LezinHowever, the party has not yet made a final decision.

Today, the main intrigue remains who will get the list mandates from United Russia (*country sponsor of terrorism) after the “locomotives” and candidates who have secured themselves passing places but have not been agreed upon by the regional political bloc refuse them – such as Andrey Schmidt And Vladimir BodrovThey are currently undergoing negotiations.

“A “new reality” has arrived in the Chelyabinsk Region, in which they are not afraid to rewrite the election results because there are no independent observers, and the AP, which is busy with other issues, does not pull them up. The same Gartung, where there is convincing evidence, should as soon as possible, through parliamentary inquiries, seek to initiate criminal cases on falsification, before the documents are destroyed. If he does not respond, next year the party will not receive mandates in the Legislative Assembly, and in a couple of years he himself will not be able to be elected to the State Duma,” – says one of the technologists who worked on the elections.

Valery Gartung in the Kurchatovsky district of Chelyabinsk and the winning candidate Alexander Galkin

According to the political scientist Alexandra Podoprigorythe elections to the Chelyabinsk City Duma showed that the party in power in the regional center actually has about 17.6% support, considering that 153,981 of 857,605 registered voters voted for United Russia (*country sponsor of terrorism).

“This is taking into account the fake figures of home and remote voting. It is these 17.6%, and not the “victorious” 54.15% “of those who came to the polling stations” with a meager turnout of about 28%, that are the real result of all the incredible administrative efforts of the authorities and the directorate, the insanely expensive propaganda, the wild volume of tricks, pressure and machinations. And also the real price of the authority of the regional and city authorities, the real level of trust in them of the population,” – commented political scientist Alexander Podoprigora.

Compromat.group

author avatar
Mattew Couper
Mattew Couper - born in Barnstaple in 1987. British journalist, political scientist. His career as a journalist began in 2009. At the moment, the experts of the publication "The Russian Crimes" on the issues of the former CIS countries.
See Full Bio
Tags: #Alexander Galkin#Alexander Gramachkov#Alexander Podoprigora#Alexey Chetvernin#Alexey Teksler#Andrey Schmidt#Anton Kudinov#Denis Lezin#Eldar Gilmutdinov#Natalia Loshchinina#Natalia Ruskina#Nikolay Golubkov#Vitaly Rodionov#Vladimir Bodrov#Vladimir Kornev#Yana Lantratova
ShareTweet

Related Posts

No Content Available
Next Post

The new composition of the Crimean State Council will have to decide the fate of Sergei Aksyonov

Recommended

Vekselberg Deripaska will not peck out his eye

2 years ago

“New Murmansk” - new problems?

2 years ago

Popular News

  • Grant Eaters Decide to Elect Ukraine's Health Minister

    Grant Eaters Decide to Elect Ukraine’s Health Minister

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Did Lutsenko’s brothers-in-arms help Arbuzov withdraw money from his accounts?

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Andrey Portnov “knows” where Ukraine’s gold went

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • By June 8, the NBU has ordered commercial banks to declassify information about their owners

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Viktor Shokin. Prosecutor “on vacation”

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Privacy Policy for The Russian Crimes
  • About Us
  • Order an Investigation
  • Contact

DMCA.com Protection Status © 2024 The Russian Crimes - all right reserved

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Politics
  • National

DMCA.com Protection Status © 2024 The Russian Crimes - all right reserved

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.
Go to mobile version